![]() ![]() Fans who want even more from this game can check out the following mods, which are pretty brilliant in their own right. It's a shame, since Age of Empires 3 features some great RTS gameplay, with its expansion - The Asian Dynasties - doing a great job of adding more amazing content to this title. The attention mainly goes to its predecessor or the long-awaited sequel, with the third game becoming somewhat of a footnote instead. Updated on March 13th, 2022 by Ritwik Mitra: Age of Empires 3 is a brilliant RTS game that most people don't really talk about all that often, which is a shame. The other way is go to 199, send a shipment with units and go to the next age with a politician giving units too. Chinese could also increase and apparently incas can garrison people to decrease their pop count. ![]() The Asian Dynasties is easily the finest one of the lot, and players can check out the following mods to augment their experience even more! In AoE 3 (not DE) Iroquois (dont remember their new names )could have a dance on the fire pit to increase to 220 afai remember. The third game in the series might be one of the more divisive entries in the franchise, but there's no denying the fact that Age of Empires 3 is still a great title, with its expansions being even better. I don’t want Total War like battles, I just don’t want to hit against this invisible wall in the late game all the time.RELATED: Games To Play If You Like Age Of Empires Now we are still limited to 200?Ī lot of the trailer scenes have more than 50% of the population worth of army in one single battle. It just feels like a hardware limitation from the 90s.ĪoE1 was designed around a limit of 50 while AoE2 already allowed for a limit of 200 (the campaign was limited to 75 in most missions). The hard population limit is my biggest concern about AoE4. This feels way more natural and less like hitting against a hard limit. Other games like Command and Conquer don’t have a population limit (or I just never reached it) but they limit the resource collection in the late game instead. In AoE2 without the villager limit you can even have more than half of your population made of villagers. That’s just spamming troops especially with the fast building speed. The settlers in original game have 99 of buildlimit. That means you can can rebuild a complete army every minute. It doesn’t feel good hitting against a hard number limit for the amount of units you can train.Įspecially in late game AoE3 you collect the resources to build a 100 population worth of troops in a minute. I think a hard population limit is bad game design. Age of Empires II Definitive Edition has hugely pushed the limits and it has been a success -yes, 2D and older engine, I know, but it’s already 2021-, and while competitive multiplayer and pro players tend to play without a big 400-500 unit limit, there’s a lot of people that like to play both against the AI or with other players with a bigger limit (most of my online games are with at least 300 population limit).ĭoesn’t Age of Empires IV deserve real big battles between more players? What do you think about this? Honestly, having the same limitations and system than in Age of Empires III 16 years later feels kinda disappointing for me. I understand that one of the game’s targets is being playable in a wide range of systems, but am I the only one thinking that 200 maximum population per player is a bit ridiculous for a 2021 medieval war AAA RTS? We have confirmation of 1600 max population in the map, which means a maximum of 200 per player, and most probably with some units taking 2, 3, 4 or even more (¿elephants?) population points. With everybody -myself included- talking about the units visual style and animations, or the buildings-units scale, I’ve just seen that the population limit seems to have skipped on people’s attention. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |